Coffee farmers are a primary source of information, as they are familiar with existing farming conditions, and often notice any changes in production as they occur.
Information from farmers and farming communities is crucial to identifying climate-related risks and prioritizing appropriate adaptation measures. To analyze the impacts of climate change on coffee production from a farmer’s perspective, combine the following three methods:
A farmer diagnostic is based on individual farmer interviews and field visits. It will help you to: a) identify climate change impacts on coffee production and b) capture the perceptions, experiences and observations of individual farmers with regard to current production problems and challenges on their farms.
Visit individual farmers, interview them and take a short visit to their farm. During the interview identify the three most pressing problems and, during the visual inspection of the farm, observe the general state of the production plot. During this initial questioning, it is best not to mention climate or climate change, so that the farmer is not prompted to comment on it. If climate problems do not feature in their responses, this may indicate that climate change impacts are not important or that there are other more pressing concerns, such as coffee prices. Also, it may be the case that some problems identified are related to climate, but are not seen as such by the farmer (e.g. increasing numbers of pests or diseases).
It is important to define the number of farmers you will interview to get an appropriate sample. This will depend on the size of the area that your project or extension service covers, as well as the climatic, environmental and socio-cultural diversity of the working area. Try also to include farmers located in marginal coffee production areas, as they may provide highly relevant information, not only about current climate impacts, but also about future risks for the wider working area.
Key questions for the farmer interview:
After collecting this information in the field, data must be structured and analyzed. For example, you could rank the problems expressed by farmers in order of frequency (see “Learning from experience: Ranking problems expressed by farmers”). This exercise will help you to prioritize the most relevant climate hazards and impacts on coffee production, which will allow you to later focus on the specifics of each possible adaptation option.
A focus group discussion with coffee farmers who have a long history in the area (e.g. 20-30 years) can be very helpful in collecting local perceptions and observations about climate hazards and impacts.
Ask the farmers to answer these fundamental questions:
After recording the observations and perceptions of climate change, climate variability and extremes, as well as the main problems faced by producers, you must then analyze the data. Be as specific as possible when characterizing the frequency and intensity of climate hazards and, where possible, distinguish the cause(s) from the consequence(s). It is important to remember that climate impacts do not occur in isolation from social, economic and other environmental changes. Therefore, it is not always easy or useful to try to isolate problems and define them as “purely climate- related”. For example, climate changes may create more favorable conditions for a disease, but the disease may spread as a result of increased movement between farms.
Participatory workshops, e.g. the or the sensitization workshop about climate change and impact on coffee, can help in assessing how farmers perceive climate change and define best practice. Workshops can complement the information collected through farmer diagnostics.
One option is to carry out a two-day Climate Witness Workshop within a specific community or with a defined group of coffee farmers, e.g. cooperative members. The result should be a plan of action for addressing climate change challenges that is taken from their suggestions.
The timeline helps the farmers better understand which natural and human events have influenced their lives and their surroundings over time (usually over the last 20 years).
The seasonal calendar documents regular cyclical events and activities, and how they have changed over the last decades.
The list of animals and plants offers information on existing biodiversity and how this has changed over time.
Relating results of the previous activities helps to identify changes to the environment and lives of farmers that are linked to climate change.
The two-way vision enriches discussions on how farmers perceive climate change, how these changes will affect their lives, and how they would like their future to ideally look.
The priority values exercise helps farmers determine which values are of great importance to them and should be maintained in the future. In this activity, ‘values’ are considered as environmental assets, such as soil, water, a specific plant, a specific crop, etc.
The list of problems helps to assess climate change- related issues and options for addressing them.
In the problem tree exercise, farmers determine which challenges are related to climate change (see Figure 11).
The sunray exercise can be used to break down problems and to develop solutions.
The assessment of adaptation options assists farmers in deciding which actions they should prioritize in order to adapt to climate change.
Finally, the summary of results serves as an overview of climate hazards and proposed options for adaptation suggested by farmers.
The results of the Climate Witness Workshop are an important input for the triangulation process.
The format and activities implemented in the Climate Witness Workshop should be adjusted according to your needs and resources. If you do not have time to put together the entire Climate Witness Workshop, you can instead carry out a shorter climate sensitization workshop using group activities such as:
Day 1 | Day 2 |
|
|
Objectives:
Expected outputs: A summary of climate-related hazards and the main impacts on coffee production, as well as a list of suitable adaptation options.
Required time: One to three weeks, depending on the availability of extension staff and number of farmers interviewed.
Procedure:
Take note of the general state of the farm by thinking about the following questions:
During the interview, as well as during the field visit, take quick notes that can be completed afterwards with more time.
Objectives:
Expected outputs: A summary of climate-related hazards and main impacts on coffee production identified by coffee producers, and a list of suitable adaptation options (see the c&c toolbox triangulation reports).
Required time: One to three weeks, depending on the availability of extensionists.
Procedure:
Examples | General description | Detailed, more useful description |
Frequency | More frequent droughts | Forty years ago, drought used to occur once every five years, but in the last decades, droughts have been occurring once a year or so. |
Intensity | Moderate drought | Two to three weeks without rainfall and unusually warm temperatures. |
Objectives: To assess how farmers perceive changes in the local climate and gather their insights on how to confront resulting challenges.
Tips:
Day 1 | |
Activity | Objective |
Timeline | To help the farmers better understand which natural and human-made events have influenced their lives and their surroundings. |
Seasonal calendar | To document cyclical events and activities and to see how they have changed over the last decades. |
List of animals and plants | To gather information on existing biodiversity, but also lost biodiversity |
Relating results | To identify changes to the environment and the lives of farmers that are linked to climate change based on the previous information. |
Two-way vision | To enrich discussions on how the farmers perceive climate change, how these changes will affect their lives and how they would want their future to ideally look. |
Day 2 | |
Activity | Objective |
Priority values | Farmers determine which values are important to them and which values they would like to see maintained in the future. In this activity, ‘values’ are considered to be environmental assets, such as soil, water, a specific plant, a specific crop, etc. |
List of problems | To systematize the farmers’ climate change-related issues and consider options that help address them. |
Problem tree | To determine whether or not their challenges are related to climate change. |
Sunray exercise | To break down problems and develop solutions. |
Assessment of adaptation options | To assist farmers in deciding which actions they prioritize. |
Summary of results | To make an overview of climate hazards and the proposed options for adaptation from the perspective of farmers. |
A timeline is a chronological list of key events in the history of the organization and its area. It facilitates discussion and examination of past trends, actions, problems and achievements. It is useful to think back on these past events and experiences during resource planning and decision-making, and to look at how they influence present attitudes and actions.
Events on the timeline may include spiritual and cultural events, movements of people, introductions of new technology, natural disasters, political events or decisions, development projects and more.
In developing a timeline, participants make a record of events from as many generations back as they can recall. Group discussions about the timeline provide a good opportunity to ask elders about previous happenings and traditional responses
Objective: To help the organization better understand which natural and human-made events have influenced their lives and their surroundings.
Materials: Paper (pin board size) and markers.
Required time: One hour.
Procedure:
A seasonal calendar is a tool for documenting regular cyclical periods (e.g. seasonal) and significant events that influence the organization. It provides a general picture of important environmental, cultural and socio-economic periods throughout the year.
Seasonal calendars are of particular value, as they allow local people to represent their understanding of seasons in congruence with cultivation. These are often different from ‘official’ seasons and the international calendar.
Objective: To develop a seasonal calendar for the organization.
Materials: Paper, masking tape or pins, pencils, pens and colored pens or markers.
Required time: One to two hours.
Procedure:
Producers will often have in-depth knowledge of plants and animals located in their environment. Some will also have strong knowledge about the relationships of plants and animals. The inventory allows for a rapid overview of plants and animals in the region of the organization.
Objective: To collect information on existing biodiversity.
Materials: Paper (pin board size), books on local plants and animals and markers.
Required time: One to two hours.
Procedure:
Objective: To identify changes in the environment and community life that are linked to climate change.
Materials: Results from earlier activities and markers.
Required time: One to two hours.
Timeline: Get the participants to divide the information from the timeline activity into categories such as environmental/natural events (e.g. occurrence of natural calamities) or human-made events (e.g. economic activities). Mark all environmental or natural events with red circles. Select certain highlighted environmental aspects, such as hurricanes or water shortages, and get participants to determine whether intensity and/or frequency is increasing or decreasing. Record the results.
List of animals and plants: Ask participants to look at the inventory and identify the plants and animals that are now low in abundance. Ask them to discuss and record possible causes for their decline and the likely impact that the loss of it would have on their lives. Also ask them to identify species that may be new to the area and discuss their possible impacts.
Seasonal calendar: Ask participants to review the seasonal calendars. Discuss changes or uncommon events that have been observed with regard to seasonality in recent years. These can be events such as prolonged drought, increased rainfall, early/irregular flowering of trees, etc. Record the observed changes.
Objective: To determine how the organization perceives climate change, how these changes will affect their lives and how they would like their future to look instead.
Required time: Five minutes at the end of day one.
Procedure:
The values of an organization may be widely spread, as values vary from participant to participant. It is therefore important to prioritize values that the entire group considers to be important.
Objective: To assist participants in determining which values are important to their organization as a whole.
Materials: Paper, pens, markers and masking tape.
Required time: One to two hours.
Procedure:
It is always important to allow producers to identify their own needs and arrive at possible solutions by themselves. Listing problems on a sheet (or multiple sheets) of paper is a simple, but systematic, way to help participants identify and further define the issues that concern their organization most.
Objective: To systematize the organization’s problems and challenges.
Materials: Paper and markers.
Required time: Half an hour to an hour.
Procedure:
A clear understanding of a problem is essential in order to find effective solutions. A (root cause analysis) enables producers to identify both causes and effects of a problem. It is important to have a broad overview of all factors contributing to a problem in order to avoid any biased assumptions that it is a direct result of climate change.
Objective: To determine whether or not prioritized problems are related to climate change.
Materials: Flip chart paper and markers.
Required time: Two hours.
Procedure:
The allows producers to brainstorm solutions to a problem in a structured and logical manner, and to break these solutions down into achievable activities. The name of the exercise comes from how results are presented, resembling a sun and its rays.
Objective: To break down problems and develop solutions. It may be used in much the same way as the problem tree.
Materials: Paper, markers and post-it notes.
Required time: One to two hours.
Procedure:
This activity helps producers decide on a range of actions to address climate change. Central to this activity is the compilation of a table of options. In the far left-hand column of the table, list impact issues (e.g. erosion, flower abortion, etc.). Reserve the rest of the columns for listing actions (or options) for addressing climate change. The organization will then assess the appropriateness of each possible solution.
Objective: To assist producers in deciding which specific actions they will take to adapt to climate change.
Materials: Options assessment table (blank) and pens.
Required time: One hour.
Procedure:
Challenge | Adaptation option | Effectiveness | ||
Low | Medium | High | ||
Water shortage | Develop a water usage plan | - | ||
Obtain water tanks | ? | |||
Pest attacks | Training on integrated pest management | + | ||
*This evaluation is only an example and does not reflect the actual effectiveness of the activities listed | ||||
Objective: To summarize the results of the workshop and develop a proposal on the potential implementation of the adaptation options identified.
Materials: Paper (pin board size) with the format of the summary table and markers.
Required time: One hour.
Procedure:
Climate change impact |
|
Adaptation option |
|
Expected product |
|
Activity |
|
Responsible person |
|
Time |
|
Resources needed |
|