Abstract
Coffee farmers are a primary source of information, as they are familiar with existing farming conditions, and often notice any changes in production as they occur.
- Individual farmer diagnostics
- Farmer focus group discussions
- Farmer workshops, e.g. climate sensitization workshop or Climate Witness Workshop
- Identified site-specific climate risks and impacts for coffee production and some practical experiences for climate adaptation in coffee
- Understanding of who is most vulnerable – to what and why
Theory
Information from farmers and farming communities is crucial to identifying climate-related risks and prioritizing appropriate adaptation measures. To analyze the impacts of climate change on coffee production from a farmer’s perspective, combine the following three methods:
- One-on-one farmer interviews (individual farmer diagnostics)
- Focus group discussions with coffee producers
- Farmer workshops, e.g. sensitization workshops on climate change and impact on coffee production or Climate Witness Workshops
I. Individual farmer diagnostics
A farmer diagnostic is based on individual farmer interviews and field visits. It will help you to: a) identify climate change impacts on coffee production and b) capture the perceptions, experiences and observations of individual farmers with regard to current production problems and challenges on their farms.
Visit individual farmers, interview them and take a short visit to their farm. During the interview identify the three most pressing problems and, during the visual inspection of the farm, observe the general state of the production plot. During this initial questioning, it is best not to mention climate or climate change, so that the farmer is not prompted to comment on it. If climate problems do not feature in their responses, this may indicate that climate change impacts are not important or that there are other more pressing concerns, such as coffee prices. Also, it may be the case that some problems identified are related to climate, but are not seen as such by the farmer (e.g. increasing numbers of pests or diseases).
It is important to define the number of farmers you will interview to get an appropriate sample. This will depend on the size of the area that your project or extension service covers, as well as the climatic, environmental and socio-cultural diversity of the working area. Try also to include farmers located in marginal coffee production areas, as they may provide highly relevant information, not only about current climate impacts, but also about future risks for the wider working area.
Key questions for the farmer interview:
- What are the main challenges you face in coffee production?
- What other challenges do you face in production?
- If climate has not been mentioned previously by the farmer, ask the following: Have you noticed any changes in weather over the time you have been farming? For reference, it might be useful to ask for changes in the past 20-30 years.
After collecting this information in the field, data must be structured and analyzed. For example, you could rank the problems expressed by farmers in order of frequency (see “Learning from experience: Ranking problems expressed by farmers”). This exercise will help you to prioritize the most relevant climate hazards and impacts on coffee production, which will allow you to later focus on the specifics of each possible adaptation option.
II. Farmer focus group discussions
A focus group discussion with coffee farmers who have a long history in the area (e.g. 20-30 years) can be very helpful in collecting local perceptions and observations about climate hazards and impacts.
Ask the farmers to answer these fundamental questions:
- How has the climate changed over the past 20 years? Have you noticed any changes in rainfall or temperatures in specific months?
- Have there been any changes in your farm’s production cycles?
- What are the main climate or weather-related hazards? Do these hazards have secondary impacts? For example, heavy rain may lead to landslides that block roads and make market access difficult.
- How are men and women (young and old) affected by climate hazards?
- How do you view the future of coffee farming a) in your local area and b) in your region?
After recording the observations and perceptions of climate change, climate variability and extremes, as well as the main problems faced by producers, you must then analyze the data. Be as specific as possible when characterizing the frequency and intensity of climate hazards and, where possible, distinguish the cause(s) from the consequence(s). It is important to remember that climate impacts do not occur in isolation from social, economic and other environmental changes. Therefore, it is not always easy or useful to try to isolate problems and define them as “purely climate- related”. For example, climate changes may create more favorable conditions for a disease, but the disease may spread as a result of increased movement between farms.
III. Climate sensitization workshop with producers
Participatory workshops, e.g. the or the sensitization workshop about climate change and impact on coffee, can help in assessing how farmers perceive climate change and define best practice. Workshops can complement the information collected through farmer diagnostics.
One option is to carry out a two-day Climate Witness Workshop within a specific community or with a defined group of coffee farmers, e.g. cooperative members. The result should be a plan of action for addressing climate change challenges that is taken from their suggestions.
The timeline helps the farmers better understand which natural and human events have influenced their lives and their surroundings over time (usually over the last 20 years).
The seasonal calendar documents regular cyclical events and activities, and how they have changed over the last decades.
The list of animals and plants offers information on existing biodiversity and how this has changed over time.
Relating results of the previous activities helps to identify changes to the environment and lives of farmers that are linked to climate change.
The two-way vision enriches discussions on how farmers perceive climate change, how these changes will affect their lives, and how they would like their future to ideally look.
The priority values exercise helps farmers determine which values are of great importance to them and should be maintained in the future. In this activity, ‘values’ are considered as environmental assets, such as soil, water, a specific plant, a specific crop, etc.
The list of problems helps to assess climate change- related issues and options for addressing them.
In the problem tree exercise, farmers determine which challenges are related to climate change (see Figure 11).
The sunray exercise can be used to break down problems and to develop solutions.
The assessment of adaptation options assists farmers in deciding which actions they should prioritize in order to adapt to climate change.
Finally, the summary of results serves as an overview of climate hazards and proposed options for adaptation suggested by farmers.
The results of the Climate Witness Workshop are an important input for the triangulation process.
The format and activities implemented in the Climate Witness Workshop should be adjusted according to your needs and resources. If you do not have time to put together the entire Climate Witness Workshop, you can instead carry out a shorter climate sensitization workshop using group activities such as:
- The two-way vision and list of problems
- The problem tree
- The sunray exercise
Table 7: Climate Witness Workshop
Day 1 | Day 2 |
|
|
Practical Guide
I. Individual farmer diagnostics
Objectives:
- To identify site-specific climate hazards and their impacts on coffee production, and to capture the perceptions, experiences and observations of individual farmers in regards to current coffee production challenges on farms.
- To process information about site-specific climate change, climate hazards and impacts and identify urgent needs for adaptation.
Expected outputs: A summary of climate-related hazards and the main impacts on coffee production, as well as a list of suitable adaptation options.
Required time: One to three weeks, depending on the availability of extension staff and number of farmers interviewed.
Procedure:
- Define the number of farmers to be interviewed depending on the areal extension and climate diversity of your working area (e.g. 14 to 30 producers).
- Include producers located in different production areas, especially farmers located in marginal production areas (e.g. in very low or very high mountain levels) and a long productive history in the area (e.g. more than a decade), because they will supply more relevant information about current climate changes and impacts, but also future risks for the whole working area.
- Visit coffee farms and carry out both an inspection of the area and a quick, individual interview on production conditions and climate- related problems (see general guidance and recommendations for farmer interview and farmer diagnostic templates below).
- During the interview, identify the three most pressing problems. During the visual inspection of the farm, observe the general state of the production plot.
- During this initial questioning, it is best not to mention climate or climate change, so that the farmer is not prompted to mention it. If climate problems do not feature in his or her responses, this may indicate that climate change is not important or that there are other more pressing concerns, such as coffee prices. It could also be that identified problems are climate-related, but not seen as such by the farmer, e.g. increasing pests or diseases.
- During the interview, collect information on current climate change (e.g. temperature, rainfall, extreme events and any other important phenomena) based on observations by farmers and their three most pressing problems related to climate change.
- Make a visual inspection of the general state of the coffee production system/plot (see guidance for visual field inspection below).
- Identify vulnerability (e.g. old coffee plants or no cover crops) as well as adaptation options (e.g. good agriculture practices that are making the production system more resilient).
- Record all relevant information in the questionnaire.
- Systematize collected information and identify the main problems producers are facing. The findings gathered by farmer diagnostics can be systematized by ranking problems that the farmers have stated, e.g. three points for first problem mentioned, two for second and one for third (see example of ranking below).
- Since not all farmers prioritize the same challenges, the list of problems usually contains more than three.
- In a table or report, summarize the site-specific climate change hazards for coffee production, the impacts and suitable options for adaptation.
- The analyzed and consolidated information will help to identify the main climate-related problems from the viewpoint of producers and to recognize initial needs for adaptation.
General guidance and recommendations for farmer interviews
- Explain that the purpose of the visit is to get an insight into the farmer’s perception of the challenges he or she faces in production (do not focus the interview on climate change).
- Take notes on general information as indicated in the template for farmer diagnostics (see farmer questionnaire below).
- Ask the farmer about the primary challenge in his or her coffee production. It is important to ask follow-up questions to determine if it is a climate-related problem, e.g. if their main challenge is pest attacks, ask: Which pest is your biggest problem? Have you always had this pest in this area or is it new? What do you do to control this pest?
- Ask about other production challenges the farmer is facing and specify by asking follow-up questions. A total of three main challenges will suffice to keep the interview short and comprehensive.
- Ask whether the farmer has noted any changes in rainfall patterns and/or temperature in the past years (for reference, it might be useful to ask for changes in the past 20 TO 30 years).
- Ask whether it would be possible to have a look at the farmer´s coffee plot.
Guidance for visual field inspection
Take note of the general state of the farm by thinking about the following questions:
- How old are the coffee plots? Can you observe replanting or pruning activities?
- Does the coffee look healthy? Are there signs of wilting or nutritional deficiencies?
- Are there signs of soil erosion or landslides?
- Is there a cover crop or mulch protecting soil?
- Is it a shaded/unshaded/agroforestry system?
- Are there obvious signs of pest and/or disease attacks? If so, is it obviously related to a Certain climate condition?
- What does the soil look like? Are there water bodies on the plot or close by?
During the interview, as well as during the field visit, take quick notes that can be completed afterwards with more time.
II. Farmer focus group discussions
Objectives:
- To find out how participants perceive climate change and to get a first look at changes in the local climate and impacts in coffee production.
- To capture the perceptions, experiences and observations in a focus group discussion and to identify site-specific climate hazards and their impact on coffee production.
- To summarize the information of site-specific climate change risks, impacts and needs for adaptation.
Expected outputs: A summary of climate-related hazards and main impacts on coffee production identified by coffee producers, and a list of suitable adaptation options (see the c&c toolbox triangulation reports).
Required time: One to three weeks, depending on the availability of extensionists.
Procedure:
- Select a group of five to ten farmers, hopefully with a long productive history in the area (e.g. more than a decade).
- Find a location for the focus group discussions where producers feel comfortable.
- Focus the discussion on three to four main questions and record answers.
- Ask the participants the following questions:
- What do you think of when you hear the term ‘climate change’?
- Have you noted any changes in your local climate in the last 20 to 30 years? If so, what have they been?
- Record their answers on small cards. Their answers will most likely be a mix between climate hazards (e.g. heavy rainfall) and climate impacts (e.g. more coffee rust).
- Stick the cards on the wall and cluster the answers under two headings: a) climate hazards, e.g. changes in temperature or precipitation and b) climate impacts, e.g. effects felt by the producers resulting from changes in climate.
- After this first round of questions and after clustering the results ask more specific questions, such as the following:
- Have you noticed any changes in precipitation or temperatures in specific months?
- Have there been any changes in your production cycles?
- How have men and women been affected by climate hazards?
- If the participants find it hard to answer, you can give examples of what you mean. Record the answers on small cards and aim to identify some changes in the local climate and resulting impacts.
- Try to prioritize two or three main changes in the local climate and the resulting impacts on coffee production. Cluster them according to how they are related, e.g. irregular rainfall.
- Analyze the main observations of climate changes stated. When analyzing, be sure to consider the :
- Make sure to differentiate climate hazards from other hazards and explore the potential links between the two. Climate hazards (e.g. droughts, floods or rising temperatures) can influence other non-climate hazards (e.g. biological hazards, such as insects).
- Participants may mention scarcity of resources, such as a lack of money, as some of the main challenges they are facing. If this is the case, it should be determined whether the lack of a resource (in this example, finances) is the result of a climate hazard, a different hazard or a combination of hazards, or whether the resource should be added to the list of priority resources identified in the previous step.
- Distinguish the cause(s) from the consequence(s). Make sure that the issues identified are actual hazards and not consequences, such as low yield. It is the role of the facilitator to ask the group to break down these conditions to determine if they are caused by climate hazards. For example, low yield may be the result of drought, which is a climate hazard, but also can be a result of other crop management issues (e.g. old plants, lack of fertilizer, etc.).
- Be as specific as possible when characterizing the frequency and intensity of a climate hazard in the focus group discussions so that any outsider who is not familiar with the local context can understand what is meant. For example, what may be perceived and experienced as a long drought period in a specific area or community may be defined differently in another context.
Table 22: Characterizing the frequency and intensity of climate hazards
Examples | General description | Detailed, more useful description |
Frequency | More frequent droughts | Forty years ago, drought used to occur once every five years, but in the last decades, droughts have been occurring once a year or so. |
Intensity | Moderate drought | Two to three weeks without rainfall and unusually warm temperatures. |
III. Climate Witness Workshop (climate sensitization workshop)
Objectives: To assess how farmers perceive changes in the local climate and gather their insights on how to confront resulting challenges.
Tips:
- Carry out the two-day within a specific community or with a defined group of coffee farmers, including men and women (max. 25 participants), e.g. cooperatives. Have them produce an action plan based on their ideas for confronting climate change challenges.
- Include gender as an aspect of the workshop by ensuring equal participation of both men and women. Consider mixed-gender groups for different activities in order to analyze how climate change affects men and women.
Table 23: Climate Witness Workshop Activities
Day 1 | |
Activity | Objective |
Timeline | To help the farmers better understand which natural and human-made events have influenced their lives and their surroundings. |
Seasonal calendar | To document cyclical events and activities and to see how they have changed over the last decades. |
List of animals and plants | To gather information on existing biodiversity, but also lost biodiversity |
Relating results | To identify changes to the environment and the lives of farmers that are linked to climate change based on the previous information. |
Two-way vision | To enrich discussions on how the farmers perceive climate change, how these changes will affect their lives and how they would want their future to ideally look. |
Table 23: Climate Witness Workshop Activities (continuation)
Day 2 | |
Activity | Objective |
Priority values | Farmers determine which values are important to them and which values they would like to see maintained in the future. In this activity, ‘values’ are considered to be environmental assets, such as soil, water, a specific plant, a specific crop, etc. |
List of problems | To systematize the farmers’ climate change-related issues and consider options that help address them. |
Problem tree | To determine whether or not their challenges are related to climate change. |
Sunray exercise | To break down problems and develop solutions. |
Assessment of adaptation options | To assist farmers in deciding which actions they prioritize. |
Summary of results | To make an overview of climate hazards and the proposed options for adaptation from the perspective of farmers. |
Timeline of the farmer organization and communities
A timeline is a chronological list of key events in the history of the organization and its area. It facilitates discussion and examination of past trends, actions, problems and achievements. It is useful to think back on these past events and experiences during resource planning and decision-making, and to look at how they influence present attitudes and actions.
Events on the timeline may include spiritual and cultural events, movements of people, introductions of new technology, natural disasters, political events or decisions, development projects and more.
In developing a timeline, participants make a record of events from as many generations back as they can recall. Group discussions about the timeline provide a good opportunity to ask elders about previous happenings and traditional responses
Objective: To help the organization better understand which natural and human-made events have influenced their lives and their surroundings.
Materials: Paper (pin board size) and markers.
Required time: One hour.
Procedure:
- Explain the objective of the timeline. Ask participants to identify events that have influenced individual activities and the activities of the organization. Start with someone identifying an important event in the past and try to determine the year that it happened. It does not have to be the earliest activity remembered. Record the year and event, and then ask for another event. Record the next event, as well as the years above and below the first. Help the group work back to the earliest events they can remember.
- Discussion may start off slowly. Use the following guiding questions to speed up the process:
- When did people start migrating to the area and where did they come from?
- When did hurricanes, floods, failed growing periods or other natural disasters occur?
- Which development activities were implemented in the region?
- Record the events on a long sheet of paper. Write in big letters and in a language that everyone understands.
- If there are problems identifying specific dates for some events, try to relate them to wellknown events (e.g. the country’s independence).
- Once the timeline is finished, one of the participants should summarize the results.
Seasonal calendar
A seasonal calendar is a tool for documenting regular cyclical periods (e.g. seasonal) and significant events that influence the organization. It provides a general picture of important environmental, cultural and socio-economic periods throughout the year.
Seasonal calendars are of particular value, as they allow local people to represent their understanding of seasons in congruence with cultivation. These are often different from ‘official’ seasons and the international calendar.
Objective: To develop a seasonal calendar for the organization.
Materials: Paper, masking tape or pins, pencils, pens and colored pens or markers.
Required time: One to two hours.
Procedure:
- Form four groups and make sure to mix young and old, as well as male and female participants.
- Draw a circle on four sheets of paper and mark the highest point of the circle as “beginning of the year/January”. Explain that the lowest point of the circle represents the middle of the year and that reaching the top again represents a new year. Divide the circle into 12 sections, one for every month. Hand out one prepared sheet of paper with the format to each group so that they can prepare their own seasonal calendar. It is advised to prepare these formats beforehand and to hand them out to each group after explaining the activity.
- Divide the four groups into the following topics and ask them to come up with events that correspond to their topic for every month of the year:
- Flora and fauna: e.g. blossoming of trees, ripening of fruits and vegetables, bird migration, etc.
- Agriculture: e.g. planting and harvest times, land preparation, fertilizer application, processing steps, etc.
- Climate: e.g. rainy seasons, dry seasons, hurricane seasons, droughts, winds, high/low temperatures, etc.
- Social events: e.g. public holidays, local customs on specific days, local markets.
- Participants can use writing or symbols to depict any event throughout the year. Make sure to include a legend and everyone’s name on each seasonal calendar.
- Once everyone has finished, ask one representative from each group to present their results, which should then be discussed and completed by the entire group
List of animals and plants
Producers will often have in-depth knowledge of plants and animals located in their environment. Some will also have strong knowledge about the relationships of plants and animals. The inventory allows for a rapid overview of plants and animals in the region of the organization.
Objective: To collect information on existing biodiversity.
Materials: Paper (pin board size), books on local plants and animals and markers.
Required time: One to two hours.
Procedure:
- Ask participants to work in the same four groups as before.
- Ask each group to prepare the following information:
- Name of the plant/animal
- Use and/or importance
- Abundance or loss
- Locality
- Hand out a prepared sheet with four columns (with the labels listed above) to assign each group one of the following focuses:
- Trees and plants
- Plants for agricultural use
- Birds and animals
- The coffee ecosystem
- If time allows, have the groups rotate so that each group has the chance to work on all four topics.
- Ask one member of each group to present the results and have the entire group discuss the findings.
Presentation and revision of results relating them to climate change
Objective: To identify changes in the environment and community life that are linked to climate change.
Materials: Results from earlier activities and markers.
Required time: One to two hours.
Timeline: Get the participants to divide the information from the timeline activity into categories such as environmental/natural events (e.g. occurrence of natural calamities) or human-made events (e.g. economic activities). Mark all environmental or natural events with red circles. Select certain highlighted environmental aspects, such as hurricanes or water shortages, and get participants to determine whether intensity and/or frequency is increasing or decreasing. Record the results.
List of animals and plants: Ask participants to look at the inventory and identify the plants and animals that are now low in abundance. Ask them to discuss and record possible causes for their decline and the likely impact that the loss of it would have on their lives. Also ask them to identify species that may be new to the area and discuss their possible impacts.
Seasonal calendar: Ask participants to review the seasonal calendars. Discuss changes or uncommon events that have been observed with regard to seasonality in recent years. These can be events such as prolonged drought, increased rainfall, early/irregular flowering of trees, etc. Record the observed changes.
Reflection: two-way vision
Objective: To determine how the organization perceives climate change, how these changes will affect their lives and how they would like their future to look instead.
Required time: Five minutes at the end of day one.
Procedure:
- Before leaving after day one, ask the participants to think of the future of their coffee production, as well as their homes, families and communities.
- Have them determine what is most likely to happen in the future if everything continues as it is at present.
- Then have them visualize their ideal future.
- Ask them to imagine wandering around their coffee farms and have them choose their most precious resources. These should be things that they can physically hold in their hands (e.g. water, soil, a specific tree, a coffee cherry, etc.). Have them identify up to three of these valuable items.
- They should then think of anything that would be a danger to the items in the future if everything continues as it is now. uu
- For day two, ask them to come back to the workshop with their three valuable items, as well as some challenges or problems that are or could become dangerous to them (e.g. a specific pest, lack of water, etc.)
Priority values
The values of an organization may be widely spread, as values vary from participant to participant. It is therefore important to prioritize values that the entire group considers to be important.
Objective: To assist participants in determining which values are important to their organization as a whole.
Materials: Paper, pens, markers and masking tape.
Required time: One to two hours.
Procedure:
- Ask participants to recall the three valuable items they originally thought of at the end of day one.
- In pairs, ask them to share their three choices and their reasons for choosing each item. They should discuss their choices and, as a pair, narrow down their selection to the three most important items between them.
- When all pairs have finished, combine them into groups of four. Ask each group to repeat the activity, with each pair explaining their choices and, as a group, choosing a new top three.
- Combine the groups of four into eight and repeat the activity. Then form groups of 16, and so on, until there is only one group.
- Finally, ask the entire group to present their three shared values and the reasons for their selection. Review the items that have now become less important. Ask questions such as, “How did you decide on this?”, “Were there any major disagreements?”, and “What did you do when there were disagreements in the organization over valuable items?”
List of problems
It is always important to allow producers to identify their own needs and arrive at possible solutions by themselves. Listing problems on a sheet (or multiple sheets) of paper is a simple, but systematic, way to help participants identify and further define the issues that concern their organization most.
Objective: To systematize the organization’s problems and challenges.
Materials: Paper and markers.
Required time: Half an hour to an hour.
Procedure:
- A list of problems can be created in several ways. It might include items generated from many sources, including meetings, brainstorms, individual discussions, small group exercises, transects or theatre sessions. The list should be kept at the organization and continually revised to include more information throughout the process.
- Based on the discussion during day one, have participants name the problems they identified that threaten their most valuable items.
- Record all problems or challenges mentioned.
- As a group, ask them to prioritize the top three or four problems from the list.
- Mark the chosen problems and valuable items in red and hang the list up where everyone can see it. Try to be as specific as possible.
The problem tree
A clear understanding of a problem is essential in order to find effective solutions. A (root cause analysis) enables producers to identify both causes and effects of a problem. It is important to have a broad overview of all factors contributing to a problem in order to avoid any biased assumptions that it is a direct result of climate change.
Objective: To determine whether or not prioritized problems are related to climate change.
Materials: Flip chart paper and markers.
Required time: Two hours.
Procedure:
- As an example, use one of the listed problems from earlier and clearly define what the ‘problems’, ‘causes’ and ‘effects’ are. Present the tree with leaves on the sample chart. Written within the trunk of the tree is a problem. Explain that your tree is sick and point out the problem it is suffering from. Point out that trees often become sick due to problems in the roots, from which it feeds. Explain that, in order to understand why the tree is sick, we must follow the problem back to its roots. Let the participants brainstorm possible causes of the problem by asking, “Why?” Draw a root for each cause and write the cause on the root.
- Repeat the question, “Why?” for each cause mentioned in order to identify secondary causes. Write these lower down on the roots, below the primary causes that were identified. Allow participants to continue until they cannot come up with any more causes.
- Ask them to identify effects or impacts of the problem by asking, “What happened?” Draw a branch for each effect and write the effect directly on the branch.
- For each effect, repeat the question, “What happened?” which will reveal secondary effects. Place these higher up in the branches, above the primary effects. Allow participants to continue until they cannot identify any more effects.
- After this demonstration, give each group (three to four groups, depending on how many problems were identified as very pressing earlier) one problem from the prioritized list and ask them to follow the same process, identifying the root cause(s) of the problem and the effects on their production and, ultimately, their livelihoods.
- Once the groups have completed their problem trees, ask them to present the results to the larger group and have them discuss.
The sunray exercise
The allows producers to brainstorm solutions to a problem in a structured and logical manner, and to break these solutions down into achievable activities. The name of the exercise comes from how results are presented, resembling a sun and its rays.
Objective: To break down problems and develop solutions. It may be used in much the same way as the problem tree.
Materials: Paper, markers and post-it notes.
Required time: One to two hours.
Procedure:
- Form the same groups as in the previous activity.
- Hand out the sun template with the problem written in the middle to each group.
- Ask the groups to brainstorm and come up with general solutions needed to address the root causes of the problem. Write the solutions on post-it notes and stick them at the end of the rays (or write directly on the flip chart paper).
- Ask the groups to think of how each of the solutions at the end of the rays could be achieved. Write the answers on separate pieces of paper and place them on the rays under each solution. Add new rays if needed.
- Wherever the group has identified large or complex activities for achieving solutions, break them down into smaller activities by adding more ideas off of the rays. Keep working at them until all possibilities are exhausted.
- Check that all the rays end with a full solution to the problem. Take out what is not needed and add new solutions where necessary. Rearrange items if needed (this is why working with post-it notes is recommended).
- Nominate one person from each group to present the final sunray results to the others.
Assessment of adaption options
This activity helps producers decide on a range of actions to address climate change. Central to this activity is the compilation of a table of options. In the far left-hand column of the table, list impact issues (e.g. erosion, flower abortion, etc.). Reserve the rest of the columns for listing actions (or options) for addressing climate change. The organization will then assess the appropriateness of each possible solution.
Objective: To assist producers in deciding which specific actions they will take to adapt to climate change.
Materials: Options assessment table (blank) and pens.
Required time: One hour.
Procedure:
- Explain the objective of the activity and form the same groups as earlier.
- Present the options assessment table and explain how to use it.
- Write the identified problems (climate change impacts) in the far left column.
- Discuss possible solutions or actions established in the sunray exercise and write them in the table.
- Ask each group to revise their solutions and discuss how feasible or effective they would be. Each group should fill in the options assessment table (it is advisable to have copies prepared before the activity).
- Explain that the issues should be given a value. If an action seems highly appropriate to the problem then mark the square with a ‘+’. If the action does not seem like an appropriate solution then mark it as ‘-’ and if its appropriateness is unknown mark it as ‘?’. Specific details or information on how that action will work should also be recorded in the square or off to the side. Appropriateness may also be marked with a high, medium or low value. Ask the participants to explain the reasons behind their decisions, as sometimes options may have been applied in the past and participants may already have insight into its effectiveness.
- Ask each group to present their assessment and recommendations. At the end of each presentation, discuss the results with the entire group.
- Record the final actions agreed on by the entire group.
- If time allows, repeat these steps again for another set of issues.
Table 24: Example of the options assessment table
Challenge | Adaptation option | Effectiveness | ||
Low | Medium | High | ||
Water shortage | Develop a water usage plan | - | ||
Obtain water tanks | ? | |||
Pest attacks | Training on integrated pest management | + | ||
*This evaluation is only an example and does not reflect the actual effectiveness of the activities listed |
Summary of results
Objective: To summarize the results of the workshop and develop a proposal on the potential implementation of the adaptation options identified.
Materials: Paper (pin board size) with the format of the summary table and markers.
Required time: One hour.
Procedure:
- Discuss the activities listed in the options assessment table and collect further tasks that would have to be executed for each of the adaptation measures (tasks listed here do not have to be in any particular order). The participants should define these tasks as precisely as possible, thinking of every step that would have to be taken for implementation. Ask them to also think of necessary resources (including human resources) for each task.
- Ask the group to prioritize the activities. Depending on the dynamic of the group, it may be easier to have them prioritize activities while still in small groups and then present them to the others.
- Ask the entire group to revise and evaluate the activities listed. As they agree on each activity, insert them in the summary table below (Table 26).
- Repeat these steps for each activity that has been identified and prioritized.
- Explain that this summary table and its detailed results form an essential input for the assessment of climate change issues in the region.
Table 25: Exemplary summary table for the results for the Climate Witness Workshop
Climate change impact |
|
Adaptation option |
|
Expected product |
|
Activity |
|
Responsible person |
|
Time |
|
Resources needed |
|